Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Weston Hurd logo

Court Rules that EdChoice Litigation Can Move Forward Towards Discovery and Trial

in News

January 18, 2023 

In a long-awaited decision, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denied the State of Ohio’s Motion to Dismiss the EdChoice lawsuit and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by intervening private school families. This lawsuit, filed in January of 2022 by several Ohio school districts and families, contends that the EdChoice scholarship program violates various provisions of the Ohio Constitution. The State of Ohio moved to dismiss this suit before discovery, arguing that no plaintiff had standing to continue litigation and that state and federal precedent foreclosed the school districts’ claims.  Several private school families also intervened to ask the Court to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the school districts could not show any facts entitling them to relief.

On December 16, 2022, the Court denied both motions, ruling that the EdChoice litigation can continue to discovery and possibly, trial. Specifically, the Court held that the school districts’ Amended Complaint sufficiently alleged particular harm resulting from the EdChoice program and that the students pled injuries sufficient to confer standing. The Court also distinguished previous case law upholding charter schools and other voucher programs, noting that the facts alleged about the EdChoice program are not comparable.

As for the Intervenors’ arguments, the Court found that the five causes of action pled by the school districts were supported by the Complaint’s operative facts, if proven in discovery. The degree to which the EdChoice program impacts public school funding is a question, according to the Court,  that must be decided after the evidence is reviewed.  Likewise, whether the EdChoice program overall violates the state’s constitution must also be determined after a full review of the relevant legislative history and evidence.  Thus, the Court denied the motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, permitting this suit to move into the discovery phase.

The Ohio Coalition for Equity and Adequacy of School Funding, represented by Weston Hurd and other firms,  is a Plaintiff in this matter.

Contact information:

Weston Hurd partner Miriam Fair focuses her practice on education law matters. Miriam received her J.D. from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and her B.A. from Barnard College-Columbia University. She can be reached at mfair@westonhurd.com or 216-687-3366.

image_pdfDownload