Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Weston Hurd logo

Publications

Challenges Faced by In-House Counsel Concerning Privilege

Posted on in Business, Publications

In­house counsel face ethics questions that are significantly different from outside counsel or criminal defense attorneys. For example, application of the attorney­client privilege in the corporate context can be complicated, leading to confusion as to who the client of the corporate counsel is and when communications are or are not privileged. This is especially tricky […]

Ohio Department of Taxation Issues Guidelines for Same Sex Couples Filing State Income Tax Returns and Joint Federal Income Returns

Posted on in Business, Publications

Ohio’s Constitution contains a ban on legal recognition of same sex unions. Consequently, despite a recent United States Supreme Court case permitting states to recognize same sex marriage, Ohio same gender spouses who file a joint federal tax return, may not file a joint Ohio state tax return even if they were married in a […]

Ohio Supreme Court Rules that an UM Claim is Not Barred Even Though Plaintiff Was Not Legally Entitled to Recover Damages from Tortfeasor

Posted on in Insurance, Publications

In Marusa, et al. v. Erie Ins. Co., slip opinion 2013­Ohio­1957, decided on May 21, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court clarified and distinguished its prior holding in Snyder v. Am. Fam. Ins. Co., 114 Ohio St.3d 239, 2007­Ohio­4004. . .2013 – Ohio Supreme Court Rules that an UM Claim is Not Barred Even Though Plaintiff […]

Ohio Supreme Court Rules that Claims for Defective Construction Work or Workmanship are not Claims for Property Damage Caused by an Occurence Under a CGL Policy

Posted on in Insurance, Publications

In Westfield Insurance Company v. Custom Agri Systems, Inc., 2012 ­Ohio ­4712, decided October 16, 2012, the Ohio Supreme Court finally, after years of litigation in the Ohio lower courts, definitively answered this question certified to it by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit: (1) Are claims of defective construction/workmanship brought […]

Maestle Persuades Court of Appeals to Reverse Half Million Dollar Judgment

Posted on in Appellate, Publications

On August 27, 2012, the Eleventh District Court of Appeals issued a unanimous decision reversing and setting aside a $574,121.32 judgment against Huntington Bank as successor in interest to Sky Bank. This matter arose from alleged damages incurred during the construction of the W. Thomas James’ Funeral Home. Maestle Persuades Court of Appeals to Reverse […]

Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court Standard of Review for a Declaratory Judgment Matter

Posted on in Insurance, Publications

In a 7-0 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court, in Arnott v. Arnott, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio- 3208, held that an appellate court should apply an abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a trial court’s holding to the question of standing, e.g., the appropriateness of the case for declaratory judgment and should apply a de novo […]